Use AI to review your clinical teaching materials for accuracy gaps and confusing explanations before sharing with learners.
If you teach residents, medical students, or other learners, you know how easy it is to miss gaps in your handouts, case presentations, or teaching slides—especially when you've written them quickly between patients. Before you share teaching materials, ask AI to review them as if it were a confused learner or a faculty peer reviewer. Have it flag unclear explanations, identify missing context, spot logical jumps, and suggest where examples or visuals might help. This works especially well for case-based teaching scenarios, clinical algorithms you've created, or summaries of complex topics like heart failure management or anticoagulation decision-making. AI can also help you anticipate the questions learners are most likely to ask, so you're better prepared. The result: tighter teaching materials that learners actually understand the first time, and fewer moments where you realize mid-teaching that something critical was left out. Always review AI feedback carefully and verify any clinical content before using it with learners. AI is your draft reviewer, not your teaching attending.
Try this prompt today
“You are a medical education reviewer. I'm going to share teaching materials I created for residents about managing hypertension in elderly patients. Please review it as if you're both a confused learner and a faculty peer. Identify: 1) Any concepts that are unclear or poorly explained, 2) Gaps where I assume too much background knowledge, 3) Logical jumps that might confuse learners, 4) Places where a clinical example would help, and 5) The top 3 questions learners are likely to ask that I haven't addressed. Here's the material: [paste your teaching content]”
March 16, 2026
Get daily AI tips like this one
WorkSmarterWith.ai delivers fresh AI tips, workflows, and prompts every day - tailored to your role.